Thoughts on being “likeminded”

Coming from a seminary where biblical exegesis and exposition is the main thrust, I find that TMS grads are among the best guys when it comes to handling the text of scripture.  There is a common and well-developed hermeneutic that leads to a relatively common understanding of the scriptures; there are guys who have shown up for a year or two and gone off into theological bizarro world, but on the whole there’s a unity of belief built on the hard work of plumbing the depths of scripture with a high level of technical precision.

Along with that plumbing the depths of scripture comes not only doctrinal clarity and unity, but sadly often doctrinal elitism.  TMS grads are sometimes vocal and proud about not being Charismatic, Arminian, seeker-sensitive, etc. and because of this some are nervous about associating with the local Pentecostal, Methodist, or even Baptist churches.  I often hear this isolationist tendency expressed as a preference to connect and work with churches and ministers who are “likeminded”, generally meaning something along the lines of “in agreement with our doctrinal statement”.

After a year away from seminary and some conversations with TMS yolkfellow, I’ve come to the conclusion that a part of this stems from an exegetical blind spot.  I have come to the conclusion that there’s a misunderstanding of the biblical idea of being “likeminded”.

So what does it mean to be “likeminded”?

Let’s unpack the scriptures on this point.

The phrase “likeminded” appears in the KJV in 3 passages; Rom. 15:5; Phil. 2:2, 2:20.  It is a translation of autos and phroneo in Rom. 15:5 and Phil. 2:2 and a translation of isopsychos in Phil. 2:20.  Isopsychos only appears in Phil. 2:20 and autos and phroneo also appear together in Rom. 12:16, 2 Cor. 2:11 and Phil. 4:2.  So we have 6 passages that could help us work out an understanding of the same idea as packaged two different ways.  I’ll place the quotes in context with the phrase we’re looking for in bold.  (The following are ESV)

Rom 12:14-18 – “Bless those who persecute you; bless and do not curse them. Rejoice with those who rejoice, weep with those who weep. Live in harmony with one another. Do not be haughty, but associate with the lowly. Never be wise in your own sight.  Repay no one evil for evil, but give thought to do what is honorable in the sight of all.If possible, so far as it depends on you, live peaceably with all.”

In Romans 12, the phrase is in the context of how you act towards people.  It’s in the context of blessing those who persecute, rejoicing and weeping along with those who rejoice and weep, not being arrogant and not being conceited.  It’s not in the context of discussion of doctrine but rather in the context of the outworking of doctrine.

 Rom 15:1-7 – “We who are strong have an obligation to bear with the failings of the weak, and not to please ourselves. Let each of us please his neighbor for his good, to build him up. For Christ did not please himself, but as it is written, “The reproaches of those who reproached you fell on me.” For whatever was written in former days was written for our instruction, that through endurance and through the encouragement of the Scriptures we might have hope. May the God of endurance and encouragement grant youto live in such harmony with one another, in accord with Christ Jesus, that together you may with one voice glorify the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ.Therefore welcome one another as Christ has welcomed you, for the glory of God.”

In Romans 15, it again is talking about how one acts; not pleasing self, building up one’s neighbor, and being like Christ.  In Romans 15:5-6, it connects likemindedness directly to being in accord with Christ in the sense of being enduring, encouraging, welcoming, and glorifying God.  Being likeminded here means acting in harmony with how Christ acted.

 2 Cor. 13:11-12 – “Finally, brothers, rejoice. Aim for restoration, comfort one another, agree with one another, live in peace; and the God of love and peace will be with you. Greet one another with a holy kiss.”

In 2 Cor. 13 the phrase appears in the context of rejoicing, comforting, living in love and peace, and how you greet one another.  This is not a discussion of doctrine but rather an exhortation towards specific practices.

 Phil. 2:1-8 – “So if there is any encouragement in Christ, any comfort from love, any participation in the Spirit, anyaffection and sympathy, complete my joy by being of the same mind, having the same love, being in full accord and of one mind. Do nothing from rivalry or conceit, but in humility count others more significant than yourselves. Let each of you look not only to his own interests, but also to the interests of others.  Have this mind among yourselves, which is yours in Christ Jesus,  who, though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, but made himself nothing, taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men. 8And being found in human form, he humbled himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross”

In Phil. 2:1-8 the phrase appears in the context of being encouraging, comforting, loving, affectionate, sympathetic, joyful, humble, selfless and serving.  2:1-2 basically suggest that if there is any involvement with Christ, believers must be of the same mind as Christ.  In 2:5, the idea is one of everyone having Christ’s attitude towards service.

 Phil. 2:19-22 – “I hope in the Lord Jesus to send Timothy to you soon, so that I too may be cheered by news of you. For I have no one like him, who will be genuinely concerned for your welfare. For they all seek their own interests, not those of Jesus Christ. 21For they all seek their own interests, not those of Jesus Christ. But you know Timothy’s proven worth, how as a son with a father he has served with me in the gospel.”

In Phil. 2:19-22 the idea is of Paul explaining how Timothy is like Paul in being concerned for the church.  Timothy is a servant of the church like Paul is, hence Paul is pleased to send Timothy to Philippi.  It is a point to note that this is the only place in the NT that isopsychos appears, and it’s in reference to Paul.  I’d guess that Paul uses isopsychos (lit. “equal souled”) here because he’s describing his concern for the church; his deep emotional connection to the church.  Autos  with phroneo would likely not transmit the depth of emotion that isopsychos would, especially in this context.  I would also guess that Paul doesn’t use autos with phroneo because he consistently uses that phrase elsewhere in reference to Christ.  I admit that I’m guessing, but it seems fairly reasonable.

 Phil 4:2-3 – “I entreat Euodia and I entreat Syntyche to agree in the Lord. Yes, I ask you also, true companion, help these women, who have labored side by side with me in the gospel together with Clement and the rest of my fellow workers, whose names are in the book of life.”

In Phil 4 the phrase appears in a pleading for two women to “agree in the Lord” since they have labored alongside one another for the gospel with Paul and his fellow workers.  This may be discussing a disagreement or something else, but this short text doesn’t give us enough details to know what Paul is referring to.  Judging from the second chapter, I’d guess that there were two elderly saints who were struggling with humility and service that Paul was encouraging to keep emulating Christ and Christ’s servants.

So what can be said in response?

Well, there seems to be a clear pattern in the passages cited that being “likeminded” does not mean being in agreement in relation to doctrinal issues.  Each passage is talking about Christ-like conduct, not points of belief regarding specific issues.  Phil 2 specifically makes the point of being likeminded in reference to Christ, not other believers.  Being likeminded means “thinking and acting like Christ”.

That basically drives me to recognize two things:

  1.  When talking about being “likeminded”, I should not use the term in reference to an issue but rather in reference to a practice.
  2. When I’m thinking about other people who don’t share my doctrine point for point, I should think about whether or not they are likeminded to Christ, not to me.  This means I should be looking for whether or not a church with “weak theology” is a place where the leadership seeks to cultivate practical Christ-likeness (manifested in service, humility, compassion, encouragement, etc.) among themselves and their members.  Someone who disagrees with me on specific points of interpretation of scripture but is striving to obey what little they know of the scripture is likeminded with me since we are striving to think and act like Christ.  It is a sad truth of many TMS grads (myself included) that our knowledge of scripture far exceeds our obedient conformity to it.

I’m not saying that doctrine doesn’t matter, or that right practice doesn’t flow from right belief, but I am definitely suggesting that some TMS fellows who I know (myself included until now) use the term “likeminded” very wrongly and probably hurting both their ministries and gospel influence because of the wrong practice that is flowing from that wrong belief.

I may be wrong too, but this is a blog and I couldn’t sleep and you get what you pay for.

Feel free to use my new online complaint management system here.

Until Next Time,

Lyndon “I fear I lack the sufficient hardware for being like-minded” Unger


15 thoughts on “Thoughts on being “likeminded”

  1. Great post! I’ve been thinking about the same thing lately…only in much smaller non Greek words. I have been sad to see how arrogantly sectarian the body of Christ often is and how many families only associate with “likeminded” believers (defined however a certain tribe wants to to define it. ) Often not even based in theological differences but unessential convictions, rules and morals. A family who idolizes extreme modesty, only eats organic food, prays using King James English, and doesn’t watch tv only associates with believers who are “like minded”. It’s hard to be the salt and light in a dark world or to edify and spur on other believers if we are all living in bunkers of self importance. 🙂

    • Agreed. There’s a whole lot of division on issues that aren’t even clear cut biblical issues, let alone actual doctrinal convictions.

      Speaking as a pastor, the problem also manifests in an opposite way where people who lack conviction in an area look down on people who have conviction in that same area, thinking that a certain issue is “gray” and then assuming that they are the universal standard for what the “gray issues” actually are.

      In the end, I need to recognize that others aren’t where I am and vice verse, and I need to look for evidences of the grace of God in the hearts and lives of those with whom I disagree.

  2. Because many Bible teaching institutions are established by denominations, often the teaching is based more on the demoninations stance rather than actual Bible truths. This is filtered throught the whole church system. Thank you for questioning the accepted understanding of “likeminded” and giving us all pause to rethink how this affects our life in Christ.

  3. i stumbled upon your website looking 4 tru answer on like minded.i will always wanna go the humility and love route and found your answer to this maturely witten well and right on

  4. Pingback: Diversity And Harmony, Liberty And Love | Trinity #StayPCUSA

  5. Pingback: Diversity And Harmony, Liberty And Love | #StayPCUSA

  6. I would submit to you that TMS pastors are dedicated to preaching the whole counsel of God and are looking for other churches who express the same dedication. The point is not to agree on every secondary doctrine, but rather it is to agree on emphasizing the teaching of the whole doctrine, the whole counsel of God. TMS pastors focus primarily on expository preaching (with some topical sermons too). Hearing the whole counsel of God will have a greater impact on a Christian’s life than just hearing about certain aspects of God. A balanced Christian life begins with engaging the mind, which prompts the heart to fall in love with Christ, which then stirs the will to live a holy and obedient life. (Dr. Martyn Lloyd-Jones, “Spiritual Depression”.). TMS pastors get a bad rap for being arrogant. Honestly, they just want you to know the whole counsel of God so that you can live as fully whole as God intended. They offer a Thanksgiving table of God’s Word. Why do people call that arrogant? It’s not about disagreeing over secondary doctrine. It’s about giving solid spiritual food consistently and accurately.

    • I don’t think anyone is disagreeing about the need for expository teaching being the primary focus for feeding the flock. Jesus Himself confirmed the value of every word (Matt. 5:18) and the Apostles & disciples worked through much of the OT in Acts systematically. (Stephens defense in Acts 7) The idea of spiritual elitism or separation stemming from a misunderstanding of what ‘likemindedness’ means was all he was bringing out. Though knowledge is absolutely essential the Apostle Paul warned us that it can puff us up and be used as a destructive weapon. (1 Cor. 8:1,11) I would contend alongside you for the need for accurate expository teaching but embracing unity over division when it comes to non-critical points is the idea. I see that often lines are drawn in the name of ‘wisdom’ or ‘doctrine’ but these can be a mask for pride, fear, and laziness to work at bearing with others and carrying their burdens. Some great thoughts were brought up about how to relate to less mature believers, for example, all of my family appears to be believing yet drinks consistently. My wife and I who actively teach and serve in our body choose to abstain out of love and to set an example. I see the problems it brings up in my family’s lives, yet I trust God to work it out. Though not a sin issue, this is a major cause of contention and I must trust God to convict them if and when he chooses. It is very difficult not to just cut off ties bc we disagree on many wisdom or ‘grey’ area issues. God continues to lead me to express His love for them through initiating relational activities and the like. This is a consistent theme Paul addresses with unity and the dangers of division, one we would do well to evaluate often in our own lives.

    • Hi Cindy,

      1 Cor. 1:10 is a general plea for unity to those in Corinth, but Paul’s specific application of that general principle is clearly laid out in 1 Cor. 1:11-17.

      Paul is talking about factions devoted to specific elders/teachers (1:12), and it sounds like those factions were built around the person that baptized the members of those factions (1:14-17).

      So, at least in 1:10-17, Paul doesn’t seem to be pleading for doctrinal uniformity (although that *is* an ultimate aim), but rather common devotion to, and rallying around, Christ alone.

      Let me know if that helps.

Share your thoughts

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s