Biblical Grounds for tossing out the “F” word – Part 1

Flaming F


I’m not think about that “F” word.

I mean, what biblical grounds could there possibly be for chucking out a horrifying word like “frankincense“?


Are you a magi?

Are you bringing gifts to the incarnated son of God?


Well then, you’re thinking about the wrong “F” word MuckMouth!

Now that we’ve cleared up that constant misunderstanding, what “F” word am I referring to?

I’m referring to the word that gets tossed out when theological debates get heated. The word that gets tossed out when someone tries to take their misunderstanding of a biblical doctrine to it’s logical extension in order to portray how horrid it is.  The word that gets chucked around when someone first learns that a favorite celebrity pastor/teacher holds to a doctrine that they have rejected through significant struggle/difficulty. I’m talking about the word that is used a bunch without any real clarity as to it’s meaning (or underlying and associated concepts).

I’m talking about the word “false“, almost always followed by “teacher” (though sometimes “prophet” or “brother” or “convert” or “gospel”).  That specific word was thrown out a lot in the recent Strange Fire meltdown and is regularly getting stamped on a whole lot of people, movements and ideas.


Seeing that there’s so many wrongful understandings and applications of the word and it’s associated technical phrases (i.e. “false teacher” and “false gospel”), I thought it would be worthy of a rather exhaustive treatment that will hit a few dozen birds with one stone.

Let’s start with laying out a few points:

1.  The phrase “false prophet” never occurs in the Old Testament at all.  The term “false prophet” comes from the Greek pseudoprophetes and is first used by Jesus himself in Matt. 7:15.  The term pseudoprophetes (false prophets) is paralleled with pseudodidaskalos (false teachers) in the New Testament in 2 Pet. 2:1.  This suggests that there’s a direct parallelism between the two concepts, though they’re different terms.

2. The term “false prophet” was also used by Jesus before the church was established, meaning that the office of “teacher” wasn’t given to the church either.  Jesus was talking about “false prophets” in an Old Testament sense when he first mentioned the term.  The only people running around claiming to talk for God, at least in the time of Matt. 7:15, were prophets.

3.  Seeing that “false prophet” is strictly a New Testament expression, I will save the examination of the concept for later.

4.  The adjective “false/lying” (pseudes/psuedos) is used to qualify many nouns in the New Testament:

Prophets – Matt. 7:15, 24 (24:11, 24), Mark 13:22, Luke 6:26, Acts 13:6, 2 Pet. 2, 1 Jo. 4:1, Rev. 16:13, 19:20, 20:10.


Apostles – 2 Cor. 11:13

90 minutes

Brothers – 2 Cor. 11:26; Gal. 2:4


Teachers – 2 Peter 2:1 – It’s worth noticing that this is the only occurrence of the term in the entire New Testament (the “dollar word” for a term that appears once in the scripture is hapax legomenon – use that in a drive thru!).


Witnesses – Matt. 15:19, 26:59, 26:60; Acts. 6:13; 1 Cor. 15:15 (the actual term pseudomartyreo, which carries the idea of “lying about being a witness” or “deceitful witness” also occurs in the N.T. – Matt. 19:18; Mark 10:19, 14:56-57; Luke 18:20; Rom. 13:9.)


Christs – Matt. 24:24; Mark 13:22.


5.  There’s a few other manifestations of the  pseudes/psuedos word group in the New Testament:

– When pseudes/psuedos/pseuma (false) are all translated “lie” or “liar” in the N.T. – John 8:44; Rom. 1:25,  3:7; Eph. 4:25; 2 Thess. 2:9, 2:11; 1 John 2:21, 2:27; Rev. 2:2; 21:27, 21:8; 22:15.

– The noun usually translated “liar” is pseustēs – John 8:44, 55; Rom. 3:4; 1 Tim. 1:10; Tit. 1:12; 1 John 1:10, 2:4, 2:22, 4:20, 5:10.

– 1 Tim. 6:20 also contains the only usage of pseudonymos (falsely named).

– Titus 1:2 contains the term apseudes which is translated “cannot lie”.

– The term appears in the form of pseudomai, which carries the idea of “lying” or “lie” – Matt. 5:11; Acts 5:3-4; Rom. 9:1; 2 Cor. 11:31; Gal. 1:20; Col. 3:9; 1 Tim. 2:7; Heb. 6:18; James 3:14; 1 John 1:6; Rev. 3:9.

So all this to say that the term “false” is applied widely to various nouns (brother, apostle, prophet, teacher, witness, Christs) and appears in several terms that carry a connotation of lying/falsehood.

It seems pretty straightforward.

A person who is a false witness is a person who either is lying about the fact that they’re a witness of something, or lying about what they’ve seen.

A person who is a false apostle is lying about the fact that they’re an apostle.

A person who is a false Christ is lying about the fact that they’re Jesus (and in case you laugh, there are at least 13 people living on earth right now who claim to be Jesus, though Arnold Potter is likely one my favorites, mostly because of this bold tract and how he was proven wrong…).


Back to the topic at hand now.

The term “false”, when applied to prophets, isn’t as much of a narrow technical descriptor as I had once thought.  “False prophet” definitely isn’t a technical office separate from “false teacher”, like Michael Brown suggests in chapter seven of his book Authentic Fire.  It’s a simple term that basically means either the prophet is lying about the fact that they’re a prophet and/or the prophet is claiming to speak for God but is actually lying in his name (and the two are basically synonymous; there’s no such thing as a prophet who doesn’t actually prophesy…).

Same goes for a false teacher.  A false teacher isn’t a technical descriptor for a special type of heretic.  Rather, a false teacher is a person who wrongly or deceitfully claims to be a teacher, or fill the biblical office of teacher (or pastor); I may go so far as to suggest that it’s a person who is marked by teaching unbiblical doctrine.


Isn’t that a little broad?

Well, yes.  It’s not as broad as it sounds.  It’s not like anyone who claims to be a pastor and is biblical unqualified is a “false teacher”…though that might be true.  A biblically unqualified elder/pastor could equally (and more likely) be just that: biblically unqualified.

In order to really work out the biblical grounds for tossing out the “f” word, we need to hammer out the concept of false prophet.  Seeing that “false teacher” appears only once in the entire Bible but is directly paralleled with “false prophet”, one must work through the concept in the scriptures.  That’s my next post and that will set us up for my review of chapter seven of Michael Brown’s book Authentic Fire.

Until Next Time,

Lyndon “clarifying terms is necessary but doesn’t make for exciting reading” Unger

20 thoughts on “Biblical Grounds for tossing out the “F” word – Part 1

  1. It may not make for exciting reading but it does comfort the reader to know there is nothing false in the writer. 🙂

  2. Pingback: Authentic Fire Review – Part 7 – Review of Chapter 7 | Watch Your Life and Doctrine Closely...

  3. Pingback: (Fire Away! Podcast) Episode 019 - Leaving A Church is Rough

  4. Pingback: Beth Moore Confronts Young Pastor’s Wife for Criticizing Her Direct, Divine Revelation | Pulpit & Pen

  5. Pingback: Three Kinds of Skeptics | Watch Your Life and Doctrine Closely…

  6. Hi, Lyndon! I noticed from your discussions in comment section there’should a clear distinction between OT and NT prophets and there are implications to “God told me”. I am trying to piece it all together and have a clear guide about what prophesy is and isn’t. Do you have a post devoted to it?
    Also, I am very confused about king Saul prophesyjng? What was it? Most commentators seem to think it was some sort of madness. Why then the Spirit of God mentioned? Some seem to think it was not God’said Spirit but the evil spirit FROM God, mentioned earlier in the text. Can you help with this?

    • Hey there Oksana.

      I’d recommend starting here:

      That’s a decent summary post of many other things I’ve written on the subject of prophecy.

      Also, I’ve addressed the “God told me” idea here:

      As for Saul, I’ll take an educated guess.

      1 Sam. 10:9-10 says:

      “When he turned his back to leave Samuel, God gave him another heart. And all these signs came to pass that day. 10 When they came to Gibeah, behold, a group of prophets met him, and the Spirit of God rushed upon him, and he prophesied among them.”

      I’d argue that 1 Sam 10:6-8 suggests that Saul’s prophesying is a divine sign for Saul, that God would be with him. It’s worth noting that after the sign, Saul disbelieved God’s own testimony about him and tried to avoid being anointed king (10:22). Still, it was real prophecy and Saul actually got “another heart” and “the Spirit of God.” All those things did was to serve as judgment against Saul’s immediate unbelief and point him to call to God for what he needed to rule (which he didn’t do).

      Then, 1 Sam 19:23-24 talks about Saul prophesying again. That event happens much later when he’s pursuing David to kill him. David is hiding at Naioth in Ramah with Samuel, and each time Saul sent soldiers to get him, they were struck by God and prophesied (three times – 19:20-21). Then, Saul tried to go get David (to murder him) and God struck Saul, causing Saul to prophesy (19:22-23). God not only made Saul prophesy, but he also humiliated him publicly in causing him to strip naked and then lie around, in the nude, all day and night (19:24).

      Again, that was clearly judgement against Saul.

      Real prophecy.

      Real Holy Spirit.

      Different purpose than “the prophets” – the first was judgment against Saul’s unbelief and the second was judgment against his unhinged disobedience.

  7. Seems you may have a few typos:

    You mention Revelation 29:20. My Bible only goes to chapter 22.

    This sentence is confusing for 2 reasons:
    – Matt. 15:19, 26:20, 26:59; Acts. 6:13; 1 Cor. 15:15 (the actual term pseudomartyreo, which carries the idea of “lying about being a witness” or “deceitful witness” also occurs in the N.T. – Matt. 19:18; Mark 10:19, 14:56-57; Luke 18:20; Rom. 13:9.)

    1. In my Bible, neither Matthew 26:20 nor Romans 13:9 say anything about false witnesses.
    2. You say the term pseudomartyreo “also occurs in the N.T.” when all the verses mentioned there are in the new testament.

    1 John 2:2 doesn’t make mention of lying or liars

    • Thanks for the catch.

      Matthew 15:19 et al. are verses where the term “pseudomartyreo” doesn’t occur. They have other variations (pseudes + matryeo or something like that)

      Romans 13:9 has the term “pseudomartyreo” in it, hence I included it.

      Rev 29:20, Matt. 26:20 and 1 John 2:2 were typos. They’ve been fixed.

      Sorry for the three typos. You get what you pay for, right?

  8. You ! Whoever wrote this should be appalled for using this play in words ….. you’ve caused everyone who has read this article to think the unthinkable !!!!! Now that word has to bounce around in my head ….. it’s sickening that you would bow down to that level knowing that everyone reading this article would know exactly the first inference that surely you knew would come to mind ….. you dhould apologize to God and write a formal blanket apology for even going there ….. we have to hear this kind of language out in the world but we shouldn’t have to put up with it from a “Christian” format or discussion …..

    Now about false teachers and professors I say burn their behinds every chance you get but please use class in your discussion ….. it’s all to easy to get used to the darkness and not be shocked any more , please think before you use this type of spin on your words …..

    Do you think Jesus would have written it that way ?

    You’re Welcome !

    • It’s also easy to feign shock at something in an effort to portray oneself as excessively pious.

      The play on words isn’t to make people think of a specific word, but to point out how those two words are apparently equally offensive and yet one should not be. I know many people who are more likely to cuss than call someone a “false teacher”.

      And Jesus did fully write that way. The Bible isn’t as starched-collar as you may think. It parallels certain ideas with what’s considered “impolite discussion”…like when Elijah asks the prophets of Ba’al where he is and speaks in some rather clearly pointed metaphors about relieving oneself, or when Paul makes a passing comment about wishing those who circumcise themselves would cut off the plumbing and not just the faucet.

      Sorry not sorry.

      • That’s the sad condition of most of the people claiming to be Christian , dull and indifferent to things that would grieve the heart of God “let no corrupt communication proceed from your mouth but that which is good to the edifying of the church ” , Ephesians 4:32

        Please I have plenty of problems myself and I am talking about myself ….. the guy that looks at me from the mirror is despicable and capable of anything therefore I must keep my eyes on him all the time and beat him into subjection continually , he always wants to be his own God and wants to call his own shots , he wants to make a name for himself , build a tower to heaven and be the center of everyone’s universe …..

        You can say that I’m pious but I know better , I’m far worse than you ….. I’m a sinner deserving of the hottest of hell but God decided otherwise before the foundation of the world ……

        Just saying that people from outside the faith would jump all over that kind of use of your choice of inference ….. we are supposed to be above reproach ….. don’t make an occasion for the flesh to be cutesy or cool , God ain’t got no time for that !

        If that hurts , good ! Don’t assimilate to the world ! Jesus is more than enough …..

        Don’t let your book knowledge get ahead of you ….. that happened to the pharisees and they wanted Jesus dead because “the whole world will go after Him” and He was wrecking their little plans …..

        • What’s equally sad is slaves of Christ who think it’s their duty to act as the master of other co-slaves of Christ…and insinuate that they’re Pharisees.

          Christ is my master, not you.

          Don’t confuse your preferences with God’s precepts.

  9. Brethren I believe there is more sarcasm, biting wit and sharp clap-back retorts in these comment dialogues than becomes mature saints speaking the Truth in Love. That is not edifying, signals a need for self-reflection, especially as regards meekness of heart and spirit, and sadly detracts from the value of Original Posts. Shalom.

Share your thoughts

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s